Latest

Our latest articles, data updates, and announcements

Data Insight

A bar chart displays the percentage of respondents from various countries who believe their lives will improve in the next five years, measured on the "Cantril Ladder." The highest percentage comes from Brazil at 92%, followed by Nigeria and Indonesia at 88%. The United States reports 87%, while Argentina, Mexico, and the Philippines each have 85%. Australia is at 84%, Sweden at 83%, and South Africa at 82%. Spain and the UK both show 82% and 80%, respectively. Japan registers 79%, India at 77%, Germany at 75%, and Egypt at the lowest with 73%. The chart has color-coded bars, with a darker shade indicating the percentage of those who believe life will improve and lighter shades indicating those who think it will stay the same or get worse. The data source is the Global Flourishing Study (2024), with information collected in 2023. The chart is licensed under CC BY.

Most people are fairly optimistic that their lives will improve

If you ask people about whether the world as a whole is getting better or worse, most people say the latter. People are generally pessimistic about global or societal progress.

But they are typically much more optimistic about improvements in their own lives.

In the chart, you can see what share of people think they would be higher or lower on the “Cantril Ladder” five years in the future. The “Cantril Ladder” asks people to rate their lives on a scale from 0 (the worst possible life) to 10 (the best). Here, respondents were asked to rate where they are now, and where they think they’d be in five years.

As you can see, most people say they will be higher on the ladder across a wide range of countries. They expect their lives to improve.

Of course, this is not true of everyone, everywhere, but these results tend to support the argument that people are generally “individually optimistic, but societally pessimistic”.

Explore more data on happiness and life satisfaction across the world

Data Insight

The image presents a line graph showing life expectancy from 1974 to 2024 across different regions. The vertical axis represents life expectancy in years, while the horizontal axis indicates the years from 1974 to 2024. 

Six regions are depicted, each represented by a differently colored line: 

- North America starts at 72 years (1974) and rises to 80 years (2024).
- Europe begins at 71 years and increases to 79 years.
- Oceania starts at 68 years and also increases, reaching 79 years.
- Latin America begins at 61 years and goes up to 76 years.
- Asia starts at 56 years and climbs to 75 years.
- Africa shows the lowest life expectancy, starting at 46 years, but increases to 64 years by 2024.

The graph includes a title at the top stating "Life expectancy, 1974 to 2024" and provides a brief description of what period life expectancy means. At the bottom, the data source is cited as "UN, World Population Prospects (2024)." The overall design is clean, with clearly labeled axes and color differentiation for easy reference.

Life expectancy in Africa is lower than on other continents

Where you are born and stay for much of your life is a strong predictor of how long you’re likely to live. The chart shows the differences in period life expectancy across continents.

Average life expectancy has converged to a fairly narrow band between 75 and 80 years in North America, Oceania, Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Africa stands out: its average life expectancy is 64 years, over a decade lower than any other region.

This gap reflects several overlapping factors: high rates of child and maternal deaths, a heavy burden of infectious diseases such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis, limited access to quality healthcare and infrastructure, and high levels of poverty.

Despite this, life expectancy in Africa has risen by almost two decades since 1974.

Explore life expectancy for individual countries

Data Insight

The image depicts a line chart illustrating child mortality rates, specifically the estimated percentage of newborns who do not survive past the age of five. The chart has two distinct lines: one representing Sweden in blue and the other representing South Korea in red. 

Starting in the early 1800s, the blue line for Sweden shows a gradual decline in the child mortality rate, fluctuating around 35% at the beginning and continuing to decrease steadily over the years, reaching nearly 0% by 2023. 

In contrast, the red line for South Korea begins more steeply in the mid-20th century, experiencing a rapid decline after 1950, ultimately approaching a very low percentage by 2023. 

The title at the top reads "Child mortality rate," and below it, descriptive text clarifies that the data reflects the estimated share of newborns who die before reaching five years old. The sources for the data are listed at the bottom as Gapminder (2015) and the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (2025). The entire chart is labeled as CC BY for Creative Commons licensing.

Declining child mortality, fast and slow

As this chart shows, two centuries ago, about one in three children in Sweden died before they were five years old.

Since then, the child mortality rate in Sweden has declined to 0.3%.

South Korea achieved a similar reduction much faster. This is often the case: the first countries to improve living conditions usually needed much longer than some of those countries catching up later — the latter can learn from what worked elsewhere.

Explore this data for every other country in the world

Article

Featured image

Does the news reflect what we die from?

What do Americans die from, and what do the New York Times, Washington Post, and Fox News report on?

Data Insight

The image presents a bar graph illustrating the smoking rates among adults aged 15 years and older across various countries in Western Europe for the year 2022. The bar heights represent the percentage of adults who used any form of tobacco, excluding e-cigarettes. 

France has the highest smoking rate at 35%, followed closely by Greece at 33%. Spain follows with 28%, then Belgium at 27%, and Portugal, Switzerland, and Austria, all at 26%. Sweden reports a rate of 23%, while both Italy and Finland have rates of 22%. The Netherlands and Germany each have a smoking rate of 21%. Ireland reports 19%, Denmark at 16%, and the UK and Norway both have the lowest rates at 14%. 

Additionally, a note indicates that the smoking rates in France and Greece are more than twice as high as those in Denmark, the UK, or Norway. 

The data source is the World Health Organization, specifically the Global Health Observatory, and the information is labeled as "CC BY," indicating it is licensed for reuse.

Smoking rates vary a lot across Western Europe

As someone born and living in the United Kingdom, one thing I notice when visiting other countries in Western Europe is how much more common smoking is elsewhere.

This is not just my imagination; this anecdotal evidence is backed up by the data on smoking rates.

In the chart, you can see the share of adults who say they currently use tobacco products (mostly cigarettes, but chewing tobacco is also included) across a range of countries in Western Europe.

The differences are large. In France and Greece, around one-third of adults use tobacco, more than twice the rate in countries like Denmark, the UK, and Norway.

Given that smoking is one of the leading risk factors for disease burden and premature death, these differences matter a lot for public health.

Explore how smoking rates compare in other parts of the world

Data Insight

A bar chart illustrates access to clean cooking fuels in various Asian countries in 2023. The title highlights that Bangladesh significantly lags behind its neighbors. Each bar represents the share of the population with access to clean cooking fuels, including natural gas, electricity, and clean cookstoves. 

China has the highest percentage at 89%, followed by Thailand at 87%, and India at 77%. Pakistan shows 55%, while Myanmar has 54%, and Nepal has 43%. Afghanistan's percentage is 39%, Sri Lanka is at 35%, and Bangladesh is notably the lowest at 28%, marked in a darker color for emphasis. 

A note explains that the reliance on non-clean cooking fuels, such as biomass, can lead to pollution harmful to health. The data source is the World Health Organization and the Global Health Observatory, with a reference year of 2025.

Access to clean cooking fuels in Bangladesh is far lower than in its Asian neighbors

Electricity access in Bangladesh has transformed over my lifetime: from around 15% of the population 30 years ago, to 99% today.

But progress on clean cooking fuels has lagged far behind. Fewer than 30% of households cook with gas, electricity, or improved stoves; most still rely on wood, crop waste, or straw. The chart shows that clean fuel usage is well below the levels reached by its Asian neighbors.

The costs are huge. Using biomass for cooking damages forests and harms health because people breathe in smoke and particulates. In Bangladesh, deaths from indoor air pollution are higher than the average in low-income countries, even though those countries usually have worse overall health. Indoor air pollution is close to being the country’s largest risk factor for early death.

Why has progress been so slow? The main barrier is economic. Bangladesh produces very little liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), relying instead on volatile imports. Its lack of domestic distribution networks also pushes prices, making clean cooking fuels expensive for consumers. Some of Bangladesh’s neighbors — like India — have given subsidies to help households switch; Bangladesh has not, making clean cooking fuels less affordable.

Cultural factors also matter. Biomass is often seen as “free” and convenient, and families are used to traditional cookstoves and the flavors they generate. They might be unaware of how damaging this pollution is to their health and skeptical of the damage that alternatives such as LPG could do.

Read my colleague Max Roser’s article — “The world’s energy problem” — for a global perspective on this issue

Data Insight

The image displays a line graph illustrating the growth of nuclear electricity generation in France from 1970 to 2024, measured in terawatt-hours (TWh). The vertical axis, ranging from 0 to 500 TWh, indicates the amount of electricity generated, while the horizontal axis represents the years. 

Starting from near zero in 1970, the curve rises steeply, particularly in the 1980s, reflecting the rapid expansion of nuclear power. Key annotations highlight that the first commercial reactor was opened in 1964, and by 1980, nuclear generation was at 60 TWh. By 1990, this figure exceeded 300 TWh. 

The graph shows a general upward trend until 1999, with no new plants added until the anticipated opening of the Flamanville plant in 2024. After peaking, the curve indicates a decline in generation towards the end of the period shown. 

The bottom of the graph provides its data source, citing the Energy Institute and the Statistical Review of World Energy, published in 2025. The image is credited under the Creative Commons BY license.

France opened a flurry of nuclear power plants in the 1980s and 1990s, giving it low-carbon electricity ever since

At the turn of the millennium, France had one of the lowest-carbon electricity grids in Europe (and the world). While countries like the UK and Germany emitted well over 500 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour of electricity, France emitted just 80 grams — six times less. This was mostly thanks to nuclear power.

In the 1980s and 1990s, France rapidly expanded its power grid, and almost all of this growth came from new nuclear plants. The chart shows this: in the 1980s alone, nuclear power grew from 60 to over 300 terawatt-hours.

By 2000, nuclear power supplied almost 80% of the country’s electricity, making it much cleaner than its neighbors, mostly relying on coal and gas.

France still has one of the cleanest grids in Europe, although it has added very little nuclear power in the 21st century. It has opened just one plant in the last 25 years, in Flamanville, following long delays and cost overruns.

In the last decade, solar and wind power have grown the most.

See what countries produce nuclear energy, and how their generation has changed over time

Data Insight

A line graph titled "There are just two Northern White rhinos left in the world; both are female" outlines the decline in the estimated population of Northern White rhinos from 1960 to 2021. The vertical axis represents the estimated number of rhinos, ranging from zero to 2,500, while the horizontal axis spans the years from 1960 to 2021.

In 1960, the estimated population was approximately 2,230 rhinos. The line sharply declines, indicating a significant drop, with the population reaching about 350 rhinos by 1981. The downward trend continues, with a note indicating that by 2018, only two females named Najin and Fatu remain, following the death of the last male, Sudan.

Data sources are listed at the bottom as African and Asian Rhino Specialist Groups (AfRSG), with a Creative Commons attribution notation (CC BY).

Only two Northern White rhinos remain, and both are female

The Northern White rhino is on the brink of extinction. In the chart, you can see the collapse of this beautiful animal's population as a result of poaching, habitat loss, and conflict.

Now, only two individuals are left — Najin and her daughter, Fatu. Without males, the subspecies is “functionally extinct” and cannot rebuild its population naturally.

Scientists, though, offer some hope of bringing the rhino back through assisted reproduction. Eggs from Najin and Fatu have been fertilized with preserved sperm from dead male rhinos to produce viable embryos. Since neither Najin nor Fatu can carry a pregnancy, the plan is to use a female Southern White rhino — the closest subspecies — as a surrogate, to carry the embryo through to birth.

In 2023, a surrogate called Curra became pregnant, showing that the method works. Sadly, she died of a bacterial infection during pregnancy.

Scientists plan to try again and are also exploring other breakthrough reproduction treatments to save the Northern White rhino before it’s lost forever.

Read my article on why large mammals are so threatened with extinction

Article

Featured image

Foreign aid from the United States saved millions of lives each year

For decades, these aid programs received bipartisan support and made a difference. Cutting them will cost lives.

Data Insight

The image presents a bar chart comparing death rates per 100,000 people across various income levels of countries for the year 2021. It highlights two categories: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and infectious, maternal, and neonatal causes, alongside injuries. 

The income groups are categorized as low-income, lower-middle income, upper-middle income, and high-income. 

- Low-income countries have death rates of 633 from NCDs, 560 from infectious diseases, and 1,279 from injuries.
- Lower-middle income countries show 662 from NCDs, 366 from infectious diseases, and 1,092 from injuries.
- Upper-middle income countries report 534 from NCDs, 155 from infectious diseases, and 699 from injuries.
- High-income countries exhibit significantly lower rates: 378 from NCDs, 74 from infectious diseases, and 487 from injuries.

A note at the bottom clarifies that lower death rates from infectious diseases in high-income countries are not countered by higher rates from NCDs, as these rates are also lower than in poorer countries. 

The data source is the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Global Burden of Disease, 2024, and it acknowledges that the metric is age-standardized for comparability.

Richer countries don’t just avoid infectious disease — they also have lower rates of chronic disease deaths

One of humanity’s biggest victories has been the fight against infectious diseases. This battle has led to plummeting rates of child and maternal mortality and dramatically increased life expectancy.

However, there are still large differences in infectious disease rates between different parts of the world. As we might expect, deaths are much less common in high-income countries where almost everyone can access clean water, sanitation, and medication.

One common misconception is that this prosperity has come at the cost of an increase in death rates from chronic diseases, such as heart disease and cancers (collectively called “non-communicable diseases”). But this is not the case. As you can see in the chart, death rates from these diseases are also lower in richer countries. It’s not the case that we’ve simply substituted one health problem for another.

That means that the risk of someone of a given age dying from any cause each year tends to decrease as countries get richer.

Explore more of our data on causes of death across the world

Article

Featured image

How Wolbachia bacteria could help us tackle some of the world’s most neglected tropical diseases

A common bacterium can dramatically reduce the spread of dengue fever and other tropical diseases.

Data Insight

This is a line graph depicting the decline in agricultural employment across various Asian countries over a 30-year period, from 1991 to 2019. The title reads "Employment in agriculture has dropped a lot across Asia in the last 30 years," emphasizing the significant reduction in this sector. 

There are several colored lines representing different countries, each showing a downward trend from 1991 to 2019: 
- India decreased from 63% to 43%.
- Bangladesh went from 70% to 38%.
- Vietnam dropped from 71% to 37%.
- Thailand fell from 60% to 31%.
- Indonesia declined from 56% to 29%.
- China saw a reduction from 60% to 25%.
- The Philippines went from 45% to 23%.

The graph is accompanied by a data source note indicating that the information is derived from the International Labor Organization via the World Bank. The chart has a Creative Commons BY attribution license from Our World in Data.

Fewer people work in farming in Asia’s largest countries

Over the last three decades, employment has changed dramatically across Asia.

In the early 1990s, almost two-thirds of the labor force in South Asia was employed in agriculture, and more than half in East Asia. Today, this is just 40% in the former, and one-quarter in the latter.

The chart shows the change across several countries in these regions. The share has fallen in all of them, but some stand out as having particularly dramatic transitions away from farming.

In Bangladesh and Vietnam, rates have fallen from around 70% to 38%. In China, they have dropped from 60% to 25%. In India, things have moved more slowly.

This matters for people still working in agriculture and those who have moved to jobs in other sectors. Productivity gains — which can allow family members and former workers to move away from the farm — mean that the financial returns per farm worker have increased over this time. Those who have moved to jobs in industry and services often see an increase in their wages. The result is that mean incomes have increased across these countries.

Read our data insight on this transition in today’s rich countries

Data Insight

The image presents a horizontal bar chart illustrating the importance of having honest elections as expressed by respondents in various countries in 2022. Each bar represents a country and is color-coded to show the share of responses categorized as "Important" in blue, "Not important" in red, "Don't know" in gray, and "No answer" in black. 

The countries listed, from top to bottom based on their importance ratings, include Indonesia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, Iran, Nigeria, Turkey, the United States, Brazil, Japan, Kenya, Egypt, Mexico, Russia, and Czechia. The majority of respondents from many countries indicate that having honest elections is important, with a significant number displaying uncertainty or deeming it not important.

Data source: Integrated Values Surveys (2024). Important responses include those categorized as "very important" and "rather important," while unimportant responses include "not very important" and "not at all important." The image is licensed under Creative Commons BY.

Honest elections matter to people everywhere

Honest elections matter because they give people a say in how their country is run. They help ensure that governments reflect the people's will and that policies respond to real needs.

It’s sometimes assumed that support for democracy and fair elections is limited to particular regions or cultures. However, data from the Integrated Values Surveys, which asks people across many countries how much honest elections matter to them, shows otherwise.

Across all the countries surveyed, large majorities said honest elections are important in their lives. Nearly everyone said so in Indonesia, South Korea, and the UK. Even in countries where experts judge elections as unfree or unfair — like Iran, Egypt, or Russia — around 80% to 90% still said they matter.

In some contexts, people may feel pressure to answer this question in a certain way, either downplaying or overstating the importance of elections. Still, the consistency of results across such different countries suggests the demand is real.

Explore more data on free and fair elections for all countries

Article

A featured image for the article announcing Hannah Ritchie's upcoming book, Clearing the Air, to be released on September 18th 2025 in the UK.

Hannah Ritchie’s new book on tackling climate change is out now

“Clearing the Air” is available now.

Data Insight

A bar graph illustrates the growth of robotaxi usage in California over a two-year period, highlighting monthly passenger miles in paid driverless taxis. The y-axis ranges from 0 to 4 million miles, with annotations at each million-mile mark. The x-axis covers a timeline from August 2023 to May 2025. The bars increase steadily, showing an upward trend, particularly sharp growth after April 2024, reaching close to 4 million miles by May 2025. The title states that robotaxi usage has grown eightfold in just a year. 

Data sources are listed as the California Public Utilities Commission (2025). The image is licensed under CC BY.

Californians now travel millions of miles each month in driverless taxis

After only two years, California’s driverless taxis now transport passengers for more than four million miles per month. Although they still make up only a fraction of taxi trips in the state, they are expanding quickly.

This chart shows the monthly distance traveled in driverless trips in California. It measures the total number of passenger-miles, summing up the distance traveled by all passengers.

In August 2023, California regulators fully approved self-driving taxi services in San Francisco for companies Cruise and Waymo. However, Cruise stopped operating in late 2023 due to safety and regulatory issues, so the recent growth reflects only Waymo’s service.

Trips stayed under half a million miles per month until mid-2024. But since then, growth has taken off. Within a year, usage multiplied eightfold, climbing past four million miles by May 2025, the latest data available.

This is a new chart on Our World in Data — we will update it every quarter based on the latest reports

Data Insight

A line graph displays the trend in fertilizer consumption in China from 1961 to 2022. The vertical axis represents the quantity of fertilizer consumed, ranging from 0 to 50 million tonnes, while the horizontal axis marks the years from 1961 to 2022. The line begins at a low point in the early 1960s and shows a steady increase, reaching its peak around 2014-2015, before declining slightly toward 2022. An annotation on the graph highlights the peak fertilizer use during that period. The graph is titled "China's fertilizer consumption peaked a decade ago," with a description noting that fertilizer consumption includes various nutrients added to farmland. The data sources cited at the bottom are the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and the graph is licensed under CC BY.

China's use of fertilizers peaked a decade ago

Since the 1960s, China’s population has more than doubled. Despite having more than twice as many mouths to feed, the amount of food it produces per person has increased dramatically.

Better seeds, irrigation, pest management, and improved farming techniques have all helped increase the country’s agricultural productivity. But the addition of nutrients through fertilizers has also made a huge difference. The chart shows the rapid uptake of fertilizers in China from the 1960s through the early 2000s.

While fertilizers can play a crucial role in feeding more people and using less land, they also have negative environmental impacts. Excess nutrients run off into rivers and pollute coastlines, and fertilizers can emit nitrogen oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas. Using fertilizers more efficiently helps grow food while cutting pollution.

China has made important progress on this in the last decade. As you can see in the chart, its fertilizer use peaked in 2014 and has fallen since then. At the same time, the country’s agricultural production has continued to increase.

In 2015, China launched its “Zero-Growth Action Plan for Fertilizer”, and its government policies have played an essential role in this turnaround.

Subsidies previously made fertilizers very cheap in China, which encouraged farmers to overuse them. Cutting these subsidies while offering incentives for agricultural machinery, precision technologies, farmer education, and larger farms (which tend to use less fertilizer per hectare) has made China’s farming sector much more efficient.

Read more in my article “How effective are policies in reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture?”

Data Insight

A line graph titled "A comparison of World Bank estimates of extreme poverty" illustrates the global number of people living in extreme poverty. The x-axis represents the years from 1990 to 2024, while the y-axis indicates the number of people in billions, ranging from 0 to 2.5 billion. 

Two distinct lines are present: one in dark brown representing the previous estimates using a poverty line of $2.15 per day measured in 2017 prices, and another in blue for the latest estimates utilizing a new poverty line of $3 per day measured in 2021 prices. The brown line trends downward, starting around 2 billion in 1990 and reaching 692 million in 2024. The blue line, starting slightly higher at roughly 2.3 billion, shows a similar decline, reaching 817 million in 2024. The difference between the lines — 125 million — indicates the increase in the estimated number of people living in extreme poverty due to the new measurement criteria. 

The note at the bottom indicates that data has been adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs using international dollars from 2017 and 2021. The data source is cited as the World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform, and the graph includes a copyright notice for "CC BY."

The latest World Bank data counts 125 million more people as living in extreme poverty — but the world has not gotten poorer

To track progress towards ending extreme poverty, the United Nations relies on World Bank estimates of the number of people living below a poverty threshold called the “International Poverty Line” (IPL).

In June 2025, the World Bank announced a major change to this line, raising it significantly, from $2.15 to $3 per day. As a result, 125 million people who would not have been counted as extremely poor before June are now included.

The increased IPL and the higher poverty estimates are due to a mix of overlapping changes, which we explained in a recent article.

Two things are particularly important to know.

First, the higher estimates of extreme poverty reflect a higher poverty threshold, not that the world is poorer. In fact, the latest data shows that incomes among the world’s poorest are actually higher than previously estimated.

Second, the overall message is the same whether we look at the new or previous estimates. Progress in recent decades has been enormous: well over a billion people have escaped extreme poverty since 1990. But this progress has now stalled. Incomes are stagnant in the places where most of the world’s poorest live. Unless this changes, hundreds of millions of people will be stuck in extreme poverty for years to come.

Read our complete explainer on the new International Poverty Line and World Bank poverty data

Data Insight

The image presents a line graph depicting global maternal mortality rates from 1985 to 2023. The y-axis represents the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, ranging from 0 to 500, while the x-axis spans the years from 1985 to 2023. 

The graph shows a downward trend in maternal mortality rates, starting at approximately 460 in 1985 and declining steadily over the years. A notable increase is observed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, but by 2023, the rate has decreased to about 197. This marks a 57% reduction compared to the rates in 1985. 

Annotations highlight key points, such as the spike during the pandemic and the significant decrease achieved by 2023. 

The data sources for this graph include the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), World Bank Group, and the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) for the year 2025. There is a note stating that the estimates aim to adjust for underreporting and misclassification. The image is credited with a Creative Commons attribution.

Global maternal mortality rates have fallen by almost 60% since 1985

One of the most tragic beginnings in life for a child is to lose their mother during childbirth.

This was incredibly common in the past, and it still is in many countries today. But the world has made much progress in reducing maternal mortality rates.

As the chart shows, maternal deaths per 100,000 live births have fallen by 57% since 1985. Progress was temporarily reversed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but rates have started to fall again since then.

As a result, there are around 365,000 fewer maternal deaths each year than in 1985.

There are still huge gaps in maternal mortality rates across the world; we estimate that closing these gaps could save an additional 275,000 women each year.

Explore data for countries across the world in our newly updated data on maternal mortality

Article

Featured image

How Britain built some of the world’s safest roads

The death rate per mile driven has declined 22-fold since 1950.

Data Insight

The image is a bar chart illustrating the prevalence of anemia among high-risk groups in various income levels of countries for the year 2019. 

The title reads "Many people have anemia, particularly in low-income countries." Below the title, there is a brief description stating that anemia occurs when there is a deficiency of healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin. 

The chart is divided into four income categories: low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income countries. Each category lists three groups: children, pregnant women, and women of reproductive age, with corresponding percentages representing the prevalence of anemia in each group.

In low-income countries, the percentages are:
- Children: 59%
- Pregnant women: 42%
- Women of reproductive age: 39%

In lower-middle-income countries:
- Children: 51%
- Pregnant women: 46%
- Women of reproductive age: 44%

For upper-middle-income countries:
- Children: 24%
- Pregnant women: 25%
- Women of reproductive age: 19%

In high-income countries:
- Children: 14%
- Pregnant women: 18%
- Women of reproductive age: 15%

At the bottom, there is a data source citation stating the information is from the World Health Organization via the World Bank and dates to 2025, with a CC BY license noted.

In many countries, more than half of children and pregnant women are anemic

Few health problems affect billions of people at any time; anemia is one of them.

Anemia is a condition in which someone has fewer red blood cells or lower hemoglobin levels in their blood. It might seem like a minor health condition, but it can have serious implications. In children, it can lead to delays in cognitive and physical development. During pregnancy, it can increase the risk of mortality for both the baby and the mother.

Around half to two-thirds of cases are caused by nutritional deficiencies, particularly iron, but also folic acid and vitamin B12.

As you can see in the chart, anemia is more common in lower-income countries: the condition affects more than half of children and almost half of pregnant women. Poverty often means that people can’t afford diverse diets and are more likely to fall ill from infectious diseases, increasing their nutrient requirements.

While rates are much lower in rich countries, it’s not a solved problem. I know relatives and friends in the United Kingdom who have struggled with anemia.

Read more in my article “Billions of people suffer from anemia, but there are cheap ways to reduce this” →